Evolution Frauds

Frauds Of Evolution.

If you can't find any evidence to support your theories, make your own evidence!

Here are afew of the exposed frauds used to support the theory of evolution and in some cases are still being used in school text books as evidence for the theory of evolution.

(1) Peppered Moths.

Remember the pictures of these in your High School textbook? The moths appear in two variations of black and gray. Every student of biological evolution learns about peppered moths. Evolutions told us the story like this. There was a dramatic increase in dark forms of this species during the industrial revolution when factories poured out smoke and soot. This pollution darkened the tree trunks where moths hung out, thus making the lighter gray moths much more visible to bird predators. So, evolutionists told us that this resulted in a much larger population of darker moths, clearly pointing to a moth evolving. When it was realized that peppered moths don't actually perch on tree trunks in the wild, but instead perch in the upper canopy of trees, the famous pictures of gray and black peppered moths on tree trunks came into immediate question. It turned out that these photographs were staged by "Scientists". They glued the dead moths onto tree trunks. But just for a minute say that this did happen. This doesn't explain any thing about the theory of evolution they are still moths aren't they? and there was no new genetic material created in the gene pool was there? Why was this shoddy scientific research accepted in academia in the first place? Because Scientists desperately needed to believe in it to grasp onto something, anything, to prove Darwin's faulty theory of evolution.

(2) Heckles Embryo Chart.

Left to right, Hog, Calf, Rabbit, Human

This theory of Haeckel's theorized that during its development in its mother's womb, the human embryo first displayed the characteristics of a fish, and then those of a reptile, and finally those of a human. It has since been proven that this theory is completely bogus. It is now known that the "gills" that supposedly appear in the early stages of the human embryo are in fact the initial phases of the middle-ear canal, parathyroid, and thymus. That part of the embryo that was likened to the "egg yolk pouch" turns out to be a pouch that produces blood for the infant. The part that was identified as a "tail" by Haeckel and his followers is in fact the backbone, which resembles a tail only because it takes shape before the legs do. Haeckle was found guilty and was kicked out of the university.

(3) Piltdown Man.

In 1912, Charles Dawson and Arthur Smith Woodward announced the discovery of a mandible and part of a skull from a gravel pit near Piltdown, England. The mandible was apelike except for human like wear on the teeth; the skull was like a modern human. These bones became the basis for Eoanthropus dawson, commonly known as Piltdown Man, interpreted as a 500,000-year-old British ape-man. But in the early 1950s, it was found that the jawbone was stained and filed down to give its appearance and that the skull was a recent human fossil. In short, Piltdown Man was a fraud. British scientists believed it because they wanted to. The failure to expose it sooner shows that scientists tend to be guided by their preconceptions. The sad thing is that it took 40 years for an honest scientist to stand up and admit that Piltdown man was a fraud.

(4) Nebraska Man.

In 1922 a single tooth was found in Pliocine deposits in western Nebraska and was said to be the missing link between man and the common ancestor. From this tooth we got Nebraska man or should I say pig. This is a classic example of dishonesty of evolutionists and shows that evolutionists can twist any thing to fit how they want it to. The funny thing is that they built up the whole figure of Nebraska man and his wife (who they found no trace of at all) from a single tooth that was later found to be that of an extinct pig.

(5) Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis: Fake Dinosaur-bird ancestor

This is another perfect example of 'If you can't find any evidence to support your theories make your own'.

The most recent and perhaps the most infamous evolution frauds was committed in China and published in 1999 in the journal National Geographic 196:98-107, November 1999. Dinosaur bones were put together with the bones of a newer species of bird and they tried to pass it off as a very important new evolutionary intermediate.

(6) Brontosaurus

Brontosaurus: One of the best known dinosaurs in books and museums for the past hundred years, brontosaurus never really existed. The dinosaurÂ’s skeleton was found with the head missing. To complete it, a skull found three or four miles away was added. No one knew this for years. The body actually belonged to a species of Diplodocus and the head was from an Apatosaurus. (source: Paul S. Taylor, The Great Dinosaur Mystery and the Bible, [Chariot Victor Publishing, 1989], pp.12-13)

(7) Horse evolution.

The so-called horse series is one of the most-used "proofs" of evolution. The alleged evidence is a familiar fossil series, neatly progressing from the small, four-toed "dawn horse" or Eohippus (supposedly living 50 million years ago) to the large, one-toed "modern" horse, Equus. Shown in-between, in order of increasing size, are usually such intermediates as Mesohippus, with three toes, and Merychippus, which had two of the toes smaller than the third. (There are actually over a dozen horse ancestors shown in a complete evolutionary "family tree.") Some diagrams also show a trend in tooth changes, supposedly evidence of evolution from browsing on bushes to grazing on grass.

Consider the facts which proponents of the evolutionary horse series choose not to disclose:

• In fact, the horse series is non-existent. Nowhere in the world can these fossils be found "correctly" sequenced in successive strata. In Oregon, three-toed and one-toed species are found in the same geological layer, and in South America, a one-toed species is found below its supposed three-toed ancestor.
• Three-toed horses are known today, in the American southwest, with all three toes of nearly equal size. Also, today's horses come in an amazingly wide range of sizes, so modern (large, one-toed) horses do not represent the last stage of a series.
• The series fails to take other structures into consideration. For example, the number of ribs, moving through the theoretical sequence, jumps around from 18 pairs to 19, then to 15, and finally back to 18 in Equus, the "modern" horse. (And what of the fact that living, breathing modern horses can have 17, 18 or 19 pairs of ribs?)
• It is observed that tooth shapes can vary considerably among the (living) species of a given kind, such as the equines (horses). Also, isotopic analyses of fossil horse teeth show that the differences in tooth shape do not indicate adaptation to different diets.
• Eohippus, the small, four-toed "dawn horse" does not look at all like a horse. Richard Owen, a leading paleontologist and opponent of Darwin (also originator of the term "dinosaur") discovered the creature in 1841. He named it Hyracotherium, because he found its skeleton to be identical to that of the hyrax or rock badger, a rabbit-like animal that lives today in the African bush.
• Eohippus (Hyracotherium) fossils have been found in surface strata together with two modern Equus species. These "distant evolutionary relatives," supposedly marking the beginning and end of the horse series, actually coexisted.

What great science this is!

Courtesy: http://www.freewebs.com/creation-vs-evolutionism